Skip to content
All insights
Brian Humphrey

Running a Cub Scout Day Camp with an AI Assistant — Part 1: Planning

How an AI assistant cleared the busywork of planning a 60-camper Cub Scout day camp — job descriptions, orientation, and coverage — while every real decision stayed human.

AI in practiceVolunteering

Part 1 of a 4-part series on Xyberal. Next up: Communication, then Organization.

Every summer I help run a Cub Scout day camp. This year it was about 60 campers, 30-plus volunteers, a full week of stations, and a theme — “Scouts of the Roundtable.” It’s the kind of thing that runs on the goodwill of parents who took a week off work and teenagers earning service hours. It’s wonderful. It’s also a mountain of planning, and that planning almost always lands on a handful of people in the months before camp.

This year I did the planning with an AI assistant in the mix. Not to run the camp — volunteers run the camp — but to clear the busywork that usually eats my spring. Here’s what that actually looked like.

The blank-page problem

Most of the hardest part of planning isn’t the thinking. It’s the starting. You know you need a job description for every role, a daily guide for each station, an orientation agenda, a coverage plan. But sitting down to write nine documents from scratch, in a consistent voice, formatted the same way — that’s the wall a lot of volunteer projects hit.

That’s exactly where AI earned its keep. I could describe a role in a sentence — “den leader, arrives 7:30, walks their den between stations, here’s what they’re responsible for” — and get back a clean, formatted draft I could react to instead of a blinking cursor. Reacting is fast. Starting is slow. The assistant moved me to the fast part.

What it actually helped plan

A few concrete things from this year:

  • Role and job descriptions for every position — den leaders, den chiefs, station leads, and a health & safety officer — each with a daily guide and clear arrival and setup expectations.
  • A staff orientation agenda for our pre-camp session, down to the icebreaker and the craft demo.
  • Coverage planning — turning a messy pile of “I can do Monday and Thursday” into a clear day-by-day picture of who I actually had, and where the thin days were.
  • Theme consistency — once we settled on “Scouts of the Roundtable,” everything it drafted carried that voice, so the whole camp felt of a piece instead of stitched together from ten different templates.

None of this is glamorous. All of it is the difference between a camp that feels organized and one that feels like it’s held together with duct tape on Monday morning.

What stayed human

This is the part I want to be honest about, because it matters. The AI didn’t decide anything. It didn’t know that Thursday and Friday were our thin days and needed shoring up. It didn’t know which volunteer was better with the younger dens. It didn’t feel the responsibility of 60 kids in the summer heat.

I did. I set the facts, made the calls, and checked the output. What changed is that I spent my hours on judgment instead of formatting — on the decisions only a human running the camp could make, instead of the assembly work that was quietly burning me out every year.

The takeaway

For volunteer organizations, planning capacity is the constraint. It’s not money and it’s usually not willingness — it’s the number of hours a few committed people can give before they burn out. Anything that expands that capacity without cutting the care is worth a serious look. This year, AI expanded mine.

Next in the series: Communication — parents, volunteers, and community partners, and how I stopped dreading the inbox. Follow along here on Xyberal.


Have a project in mind?

Let's talk through the path from idea to production.

Book a consultation